Hello everyone,
Hope everyone is enjoying their winter holidays. I wanted to post this recent article about the water system (or lack of a real one) used at the Oilsands in Alberta (essentially the Canadian Oilsands). As we know, water usage, conservation, and preservation is a very crucial issue not only to all the people living in Canada but all the people living around the world. 
Please take a read at this news article by CBC, and form your own conclusions and opinions! If you stick around, I have a few words to say after the article.
Oilsands panel recommends critical fixes 
Last Updated:   Tuesday, December 21, 2010 |  5:22 PM ET 
A  high-level scientific panel has sharply criticized the water  quality  monitoring system in Alberta's oilsands, going so far as to say  “there  is no system.”
The Oilsands Advisory Panel, appointed by former  federal environment  minister Jim Prentice, made its findings public in  Ottawa on Tuesday in a  joint news conference with current Environment  Minister John Baird, who  promised to act on the panel’s  recommendations. The  panel’s chair, Elizabeth Dowdeswell, was critical of a piecemeal   approach to water quality monitoring, saying the system is fragmented   with no links between data on water quality — including ground water —   and air quality. 
She  also said there is no reliable longitudinal data that would give a   solid understanding of the environmental impact of the oilsands.
“There  is no holistic and comprehensive system. There is no system,”  said  Dowdeswell, president of the Council of Canadian Academies and  former  executive director of the United Nations Environment Program.
“The panel was unanimous: Do we have a world class monitoring system in place? In short, no. However, we could have,” she said.
The  panel underlined a critical need for a new governance structure   including an inter-jurisdictional steering committee, an external   scientific advisory committee and sufficient resources to follow   through.
Dowdeswell did not cast blame. “It’s not that anybody has  had any  particular ill will,” she said. Rather, the present regime of  water  quality monitoring has just grown up as a very piecemeal system.
Response to criticism
She   was one of six experts appointed to the panel in September and given a   mandate by the federal government to review water data in the oilsands   and make recommendations on the monitoring system. 
The other  panel members were Peter Dillon of Trent University, McGill   University's Subhasis Ghoshal, Andrew Miall from the University of   Toronto, Joseph Rasmussen of the University of Lethbridge and Queen's   University's John Smol.
Prentice convened the panel in  response to criticism about water  monitoring in the Athabasca watershed  in northern Alberta. In  particular, a peer-reviewed study published by  University of Alberta  water scientist David Schindler found elevated  levels of cadmium,  mercury, lead and other toxic elements in the  Athabasca River.
This contradicted provincial government and industry scientists who claimed the toxins were naturally occurring.
Despite  previous federal claims that the oilsands are properly  monitored,  Baird said on Tuesday that his government accepts the panel’s  findings  and will act on them.
"For far too long, we have heard concerns about quality of water downstream from the oilsands," he said 
'Ready to act'
"We've   heard the panel loud and clear and are ready to act…. We accept this   responsibility and will ensure our monitoring systems are properly and   securely in place,” said Baird. 
The minister said he  has already directed senior officials to create a  water quality  monitoring plan in co-operation with the provincial  government within  90 days. Once that is complete, he said the government  will ask for  scientific input to assess the plan, after which it will  be  implemented. He said monitoring data will be made public at no  charge.
The government plans to use same process to examine air quality and biodiversity in the oilsands region, Baird said.
On  Monday, Alberta Environment Minister Rob Renner said his province  is  changing how it monitors water in the oilsands. He announced that a   group of independent experts will gather in January and report to the   province in June on how to best set up an environmental monitoring   system.
He said the expert group will guide the province on how to  implement  recommendations from both the federal and provincial panels.
In  September, Alberta announced its own panel of independent  scientists  to review the oilsands water quality monitoring system. It is  due to  finish its report in February.
Source: 
http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2010/12/21/oilsands-pollution-report.html
--- 
Regarding the oilsands, it is especially necessary for all measures in minimizing environmental disturbance to be taken. One probably cannot believe just how much water is used and used and used to process the oil. Now, because Canada currently is so reliant on the operation of the Oilsands, overseeing parties such as the government and the operating companies must be more than responsible for their day to day actions.  There is no hiding from that. Until the day when they are forced to ween off from using the Oilsands, responsibility for the entire environmental issue spectrum is number one.
In general, the Canadian government needs to be much more prudent and responsible with what they do for the environment.  Right now, we are witnessing the Canadian federal government focusing  almost solely on the economy. Undoubtedly, improving the economy should  be a top priority, but if the government made the environment as much of  a top priority as the economy in terms of rigourous planning and  investment, we would probably have a healthier economy, too. It comes  down to not only the direct connections between environment and economy,  but the intricate and infinite relationships between humans and the  environment - ecosystem health. If the health of an ecosystem is  optimal,  it leads to a healthier community and stronger performing  economy. I strongly believe that a healthy environment is a healthy  community and healthy economy. Higher ups in the government just  overlook this.
What can you do? It's hard to deal with some upper level  issues like this one, but citizens in Canada and around the world can  and must just continue to voice themselves to press their governments to  demonstrate more environmental conscientiousness. Don't quit trying if you care.
We must be responsible with this:
To protect this.
 
Hi from Westcoast!
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you the government always sets everything else but the environment as a priority. They just deal with things that require immediate attention. I really do hope they go through with the implementation plans. I really enjoy reading your blog. I think I will start posting on environmental issues as well.
Definitely won't quit trying! :)
Hi Ivywan,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment - keep on doing what you strongly believe in and what you're passionate about!
Stay tuned, I have some new ideas to share pretty soon.